How will the NAR settlement impact home prices?

A landmark change to broker commissions could revolutionize the real estate industry. But, in the short term, not everyone stands to gain.

Author
By Meredith Mangan

Written by

Meredith Mangan

Senior editor

Meredith Mangan is a senior editor and expert on personal loans.

Updated September 26, 2024, 12:12 PM EDT

Edited by Meagan Morris

Written by

Meagan Morris

Writer, Fox Money

Meagan Morris is the former managing editor of FOX Money with bylines at The New York Times, The Atlantic, Yahoo, Cosmopolitan, Women's Health, and many more.

Featured

Fox Money is a personal finance hub featuring content generated by Credible Operations, Inc. (Credible), which is majority-owned indirectly by Fox Corporation. The Fox Money content is created and reviewed independent of Fox News Media. Credible is solely responsible for this content and the services it provides.

The $418 million proposed settlement against the National Association of REALTORS (NAR) is set to upend the way homes are bought and sold in America Sweeping changes to what essentially was a 6% default commission structure should make the buying and selling process more transparent and ultimately drive down costs for sellers and buyers alike.

However, there may be some unintended consequences that largely impact first-time homebuyers.

General implications

The 6% commission, paid by the buyer and split between the buyer’s agents and the home seller’s listing agents, has been the traditional way both real estate agents get paid. But that may no longer be the case. Pending final approval from the court, broker commissions will be prohibited from being advertised on the multiple listing service (MLS). The new rule would go into effect mid-July. This simple change means:

  • Real estate commissions will no longer be visible on MLS listings: In other words, buyer agent commissions and offers of compensation may no longer be “guaranteed” (or known) unless negotiated with the buyer up front or until negotiated with a willing seller. This could put both buyers and sellers in a better position to set the terms for agent compensation.
  • A seller may choose not to pay any commission or fees to the buyer’s agent: This means buyers may need to pay up front for agent fees instead of, effectively, rolling them into the cost of a mortgage.
  • Flat-fee pricing could replace or supplement the cooperative compensation structure: As the de facto 6% commission model is effectively phased out, real estate professionals may find ways to appeal to value-oriented consumers. Home sellers also may opt to use flat-fee brokerages to list their property.
  • Buyers may be more likely to use a real estate lawyer, a la carte services, or go it alone: When faced with potentially steep up-front agent costs, buyers may choose lower-cost options, especially if they provide equal or greater value.
  • Agents may need to make stronger cases for value: Sellers with more room to negotiate and buyers newly on the hook for up-front costs are more likely to demand transparency and value — what services do agents provide and at what rates?
  • Less-qualified agents may be pushed out of the industry: Buyer brokers were essentially guaranteed a commission regardless of the individual level or service quality. Those who can’t acclimate to a more competitive environment may be unable to recruit new business.
  • Removing the sales price as an incentive may improve value: If compensation is unattached to the home sales price, agents may be less tempted to let their interests influence where a buyer or seller makes or accepts an offer.
  • Lower real estate transaction costs overall: If buyers and sellers negotiate with their agents for services rendered, they may choose fewer services in exchange for lower costs, or increased competition will reduce the cost of agent services (or both).
  • Lower home prices: Lower transaction costs, less focus on agent commissions, and increased up-front buyer costs are some factors that could lead to lower home prices, but likely not overnight.
pin Icon

Good to know:

A seller with a $500,000 home who chooses not to pay the standard 3% buyer’s agent commission will save $15,000 ($500,000 x 3%). Depending on what they negotiate with their agent, that buyer could save even more.

Short-term implications

The new rules could impact buyers and sellers far ahead of the anticipated mid-July start date, potentially impacting the busy summer selling season. However, how buyers and sellers, as well as potential buyers and sellers, respond may depend more on their perception of what the NAR settlement changes mean for the real estate industry over substantial short-term changes in the real estate marketplace.

Prospective sellers may wait

Some prospective sellers may wait until the new rules take effect before listing. Once real estate commissions are no longer advertised on the MLS, sellers may perceive that they stand to “save” at least 3% and be in a better position to negotiate fees. It’s also possible that some sellers with actively listed properties may pull them or attempt to renegotiate based on the imminent rule changes.

More sellers may list post-rule changes

Once the new rules take effect, more sellers may list to capitalize on potential savings while property values are high. The NAR ruling has been touted to bring about major change and lower home prices, which could frighten some into listing sooner rather than later in anticipation of a possible housing market correction. However, it should be noted that price changes due to the settlement agreement alone are unlikely to happen overnight.

This is partly related to the industry’s use of “comps,” or comparables, by which they appraise real estate. Comparables are recently sold homes — ideally within the last few months and in the same area. Since most comparables won’t have been affected by the rule changes, appraisal values in the summer and early fall are also less likely to be impacted.

Buyers may wait

Some buyers may wait to buy a home in anticipation of potential price drops. But, as noted above, based on changes to agent compensation alone, home prices seem unlikely to dive overnight as a result of the settlement agreement.

Rule changes could motivate buyers

On the flip side, some buyers may want to buy now. These buyers may be concerned about how they will pay their agent’s commission or fee if the seller no longer pays it. In the short term, buyers may benefit less from the rule changes — until home prices adjust to reflect lower commissions.

Another change for homebuyers is that they must sign a buyer representation agreement before viewing a house with an agent. While written agreements were encouraged previously, they were not required. Under the new model, this could increase up-front costs for borrowers — if, for example, agents charge by the hour or per showing.

tip Icon

Interesting tidbit:

If prospective sellers wait to list and buyers purchase sooner in anticipation of NAR rule changes, some markets could experience drops in inventory.

First-time homebuyers

The general consensus is that increased transparency and opportunities to negotiate with REALTORS is a win for consumer choice that will bring much-needed change to the American real estate market. However, in the short term, one group may struggle, and it’s not real estate agents.

Thirty-two percent of homes sold last year were bought by first-time buyers, according to the NAR’s 2023 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. First-time homebuyers struggle most with saving for a down payment and closing costs; many states, as a result, have set up first-time homebuyer downpayment assistance programs to help. But what the market may not be ready for — or first-time buyers — is the additional burden of paying agent fees out of pocket.

Depending on how the market responds, many first-time homebuyers could see their buying power limited or be pushed out of the market entirely. Given their large numbers, this could significantly affect the real estate market as a whole.

Economic factors

How homes are bought and sold in the United States may be changing amid a potentially volatile economic backdrop. Credit card balances increased to an all-time high of $1.13 trillion in the fourth quarter of 2023, and about 8.5% of those balances transitioned into delinquency, according to the Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

This suggests that homeowners might be inclined to tap their equity, even more so if they think NAR rule changes could benefit them in the short term or hurt them in the long run.

pin Icon

Note:

Federal student loan payment delinquencies won’t be reported to the credit bureaus until the fourth quarter of 2024. Since payments resumed in October 2023 after a pause of three years, this could shed more light on the number of cash-strapped homeowners.

Meet the contributor:
Meredith Mangan
Meredith Mangan

Meredith Mangan is a senior editor and expert on personal loans.

Fox Money

Fox Money is a property of Credible Operations, Inc., which is majority-owned indirectly by Fox Corporation. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. All rights reserved. Use of this website (including any and all parts and components) constitutes your acceptance of Fox's Terms of Use and Updated Privacy Policy | Your Privacy Choices.

Fox Money is a property of Credible Operations, Inc., which is majority-owned indirectly by Fox Corporation. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. All rights reserved. Use of this website (including any and all parts and components) constitutes your acceptance of Fox's Terms of Use and Updated Privacy Policy | Your Privacy Choices.

*Credible Operations, Inc. We arrange but do not make loans. All loans are subject to underwriting and approval. Registered Mortgage Broker - NYS Department of Financial Services. Advertised rates are subject to change and may not be available at closing, unless locked with a lender