Michigan judge hears latest clash over stay-home orders
The clash in Michigan is the latest feud between Democratic governors who have ordered people to stay home and conservatives who believe the steps are excessive
DETROIT — Republicans who control the Michigan Legislature urged a judge Friday to strike down stay-home orders and other restrictions related to the coronavirus, saying Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer trampled their authority in determining statewide emergencies.
The clash in Michigan is the latest between Democratic governors who have shut down businesses and ordered people to stay home in response to COVID-19 and conservatives who believe the steps are excessive.
FAUCI: REOPENING TOO SOON COULD 'TURN THE CLOCK BACK' ON ECONOMIC RECOVERY
The Wisconsin Supreme Court this week ruled against Gov. Tony Evers, clearing the way for bars and restaurants to reopen.
The dispute in Michigan centers on two laws: a 1976 statute that gives the Legislature a role in emergency declarations after 28 days, and another from 1945 that grants broad authority to governors.
The House and Senate, which are controlled by Republicans, did not extend Whitmer’s disaster emergency declaration in late April but she acted anyway.
“The governor has acted against the expressed will of the Legislature and is exercising authority that does not exist,” attorney Michael R. Williams argued on behalf of lawmakers.
TRUMP 'TOTALLY' DISAGREES WITH FAUCI ON SCHOOL REOPENINGS
Whitmer, he said, believes she can wield sweeping “unbounded” authority without any say from lawmakers. Williams said the 1945 law cited by the governor was aimed at local emergencies, not statewide pandemics.
Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens pressed the governor’s lawyer by asking if Whitmer simply could declare an emergency for her entire four-year term.
CORONAVIRUS TO FORCE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UNIVERSITY LARGELY ONLINE FOR FALL
Chris Allen of the attorney general’s office said certain conditions must exist for the governor to act. He said there’s no “blank check.”
Stephens didn’t immediately make a decision. She predicted that her ruling would be appealed to “my big bosses” at the Michigan Supreme Court.