Top Republicans double down on efforts to rein in SEC Gensler's climate proposal

Congressional Republicans are launching a full-scale attack against Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler's new climate disclosure rules, setting the stage for lawsuits to nullify the regulations if they are approved by the agency later this year, FOX Business has learned. 

The rules would, for the first time, mandate that all public companies make vast and some say costly disclosures about how their operations impact the environment. Critics say meeting the requirements as written would be impossible because it would force corporate boards to weigh in on politically thorny and debatable issues such as climate change and global warming.

EXCLUSIVE: REPUBLICANS INTRODUCE LEGISLATION TO THWART ESG-RELATED SEC DISCLOSURE DEMANDS

In a letter, reviewed by FOX Business, House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., along with Senate Banking Committee ranking member Tim Scott, R-S.C., and House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Chairman Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., are demanding that Gensler turn over all related communications and records on the rule going back as far as Jan. 20, 2021.

In addition to the document requests, the GOP members want to know if Gensler and his team considered the rule's impact on energy prices. Also being asked is whether the SEC considered the First Amendment implications involved in demanding that companies disclose information that is not normally considered disclosable for public companies. 

As a result, the trio said in the letter that the rule as written would "appear to compel speech."

"We are deeply concerned with the SEC's lack of transparency and disregard for legitimate congressional oversight inquiries, and call on you to be more responsive to congressional informational requests going forward," the letter stated.

Gensler has in the past ignored GOP congressional inquiries into his agenda that Republicans say often pushes the boundaries of the SEC's mandate.

The GOP attack comes amid a broader political debate over what’s known as Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) edicts that are designed to prod companies to reduce their carbon footprint as well as adopt policies involving diversity and social issues. Republicans have launched a major offensive against so-called ESG mandates, including criticism of asset managers such as BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street that use ESG filters to make investment decisions.

WHAT IS ESG? INVESTING WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE IN MIND

Republicans say such filters help discourage oil and energy exploration, leading to higher gas prices and inflation, while promoting a progressive political agenda.

"The SEC’s climate proposal is yet another example of the Biden administration’s progressive overreach," Scott said in a separate statement to FOX Business. "Instead of protecting American investors and facilitating capital formation, Chair Gensler is using the SEC as a tool to advance the administration’s partisan agenda and is refusing to answer to Congress and the American people. This must stop. I am proud to work with my colleagues to reign in the SEC." 

The SEC's proposed environmental disclosure rules are the brainchild of Gensler, a former Goldman Sachs banker and academic who has said that investors need to know how corporate activities impact the environment because climate change poses a significant threat to economic growth.

But Gensler's proposals have been met with skepticism not just from conservatives but also from those companies that are adherents to ESG policies. Most ESG edicts allow for investing in energy companies. In fact, BlackRock is one of the largest investors in the oil sector.

The SEC rules are so sweeping in their scope that public companies would be forced to estimate and disclose how their operations impact often nebulous scientific climate theories. Critics say the costs of meeting disclosure requirements would be enormous. Banks would likely cut back on lending to energy companies rather than meeting such a heavy disclosure burden.

BLACKROCK NOT CHANGING STANCE ON ESG INVESTING, DESPITE CRITICISM

BlackRock, for example, criticized the vast amount of information required in a comment letter saying the SEC rule as written "will decrease the effectiveness of the commission's overarching goal" in providing "reliable climate-related information to investors."

"Gensler would be well-advised to pull the proposal," said Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. "The SEC was designed to police investment markets and make sure fair financial information is available for investors – when you take that authority and use it for other purposes it is inappropriate and undermines the mission of the agency."

Elson believes that based on recent Supreme Court precedent the regulations will face immediate legal challenges and likely to be overturned. "It can pass the SEC, but it will be challenged and thrown out if it reaches the Supreme Court," he said.

The SEC's role established by Congress is as an investor protection agency, not an environmental watchdog, Elson said. "The argument that climate disclosures protect investors is a real stretch," he added.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The SEC declined to comment, but on its website, it said it will vote on the climate rules by April, where the proposal is expected to pass by a 3-2 vote, with Gensler and the two other Democrats on the full commission approving the measure.

Pat Toomey, R-Pa., a ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee before his retirement last year, had unsuccessfully demanded information from Gensler on his climate rule plans. But Republicans now hold the majority in the House, have more power to launch hearings and possibly compel Gensler to testify as investigations into his activities at the SEC continue.

When asked to comment on the letter to Gensler, an SEC spokesperson replied, "Chair Gensler responds to Members of Congress directly rather than through the media."