Chinese companies flagged for security concerns by US rebrand, change company names to avoid sanction
Rebranding is a common strategy for Chinese companies to avoid US legal sanction
Atlas Organization founder Jonathan D.T. Ward assesses Biden's executive order that focuses on the business of selling American's personal info and discusses the extent of Chinese surveillance.
Chinese companies under investigation by the U.S. government are using shell companies, new names and other legal workarounds to continue doing business in America, according to a recent report.
"Chinese firms take a blow but then adjust business strategy and are able to move in another direction," Derek Scissors, a former commissioner on the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, told The Wall Street Journal.
Hesai, which makes Lidar, a sensor technology, set up American Lidar as a manufacturing base in the U.S., the Journal reported. A month later, the Defense Department listed Hesai as a Chinese military company, which hurt the company's stock price and prevented the U.S. military from buying its products.
CHINA LEVIES SANCTIONS AGAINST 12 US MILITARY-LINKED COMPANIES
Chinese companies that are under investigation from the U.S. government are using shell companies and new names to continue doing business in America, according to a Wall Street Journal report. (Milos Bicanski/Getty Images | iStock / Getty Images)
A BGI Genomics subsidiary changed its name to Innomics after the Pentagon designated the parent company as a Chinese military entity.
Other Chinese companies rebrand to avoid U.S. government scrutiny.
"As the U.S. government turns to blacklists as a means of identifying problematic Chinese companies and as a means for imposing restrictions, the shell game is going to intensify," a House of Representatives aide told the Journal.
Congress, meanwhile, is considering a broad limit on the use of drones from another Chinese company, SZ DJI.
INDUSTRY GROUP WARNS OF CHINESE CONNECTED VEHICLES
"DJI and all of its shell companies will be held accountable," said Rep. Elise Stefanik, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. (Haiyun Jiang/Bloomberg via / Getty Images)
"DJI and all of its shell companies will be held accountable," Rep. Elise Stefanik, who serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, told the Journal.
But Scissors, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told the Journal that it was more effective to target tech industries that are vulnerable to security breaches than to pick and choose individual companies.
"You should not be sanctioning individual firms, you should be sanctioning technology sectors," Scissors said.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
DJI, American Lidar, Innomics and BGI Genomics did not respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.