Trump can bring down inflation: John Paulson

Paulson criticized the Biden and Harris administration for the rise in inflation during their tenure

Billionaire hedge fund founder John Paulson, a major fundraiser for former President Trump, said Wednesday that Trump's economic plan would help bring down inflation.

During an appearance on FOX Business Network's "Mornings with Maria," Paulson also criticized Democrats' Inflation Reduction Act for worsening inflationary pressures in the economy.

"I think the Act should be, you should drop ‘Reduction’ — it should've been called the Inflation Act," he told host Maria Bartiromo. "Inflation under [President] Biden has been over 20% cumulatively since he's been elected — under Trump it was just over 7%."

"So Trump managed the economy much better, much lower inflation, growth in real wages, and I'd expect the same if he's elected again," Paulson added.

TRUMP VOWS TO REVERSE SALT DEDUCTION CAP HE SIGNED IN 2017

Trump points to crowd at campaign rally

Billionaire hedge fund manager John Paulson said that former President Trump's economic plan could curb inflation and lower the deficit. (David Dee Delgado/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Inflation was 1.4% when the Biden-Harris administration took office in January 2021, but began a steady rise amid pandemic-related supply chain disruptions and elevated federal spending meant to mitigate the pandemic's economic impact. 

Inflation surged to a 40-year high of 9.1% in June 2022, prompting the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates to the highest level in over two decades to tamp down inflation, which has since slowed to 2.4% in September when the Fed began cutting interest rates.

John Paulson

Paulson is a fundraiser for former President Trump's campaign. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Paulson went on to explain that Trump "wants to bring down inflation and he wants to bring down interest rates." 

"To do that, you have to constrain and bring down the deficit, and he's got policies to do that. One is by constraining spending, for instance, the tax incentives for the Green New Deal subsidizing uneconomic forms of energy such as solar, wind, electric vehicles, cost about $1.2 trillion over the next 10 years. So eliminating those subsidies is a pretty significant reduction in spending," Paulson said.

"By putting tariffs, if you put an average 15% tariff on the $3 trillion of imports, that's $450 billion of incremental revenues. Growth will add incremental revenue. So by reducing spending, increasing revenues, the deficit will come down," he added.

TRUMP VP PICK VANCE SLAMS BIDEN FOR SUPPORTING NAFTA, TRADE WITH CHINA

Tariffs, which are taxes on imports, are the primary source of new tax revenue in former President Trump's economic plans. Trump has said the baseline tariff would be set at 10% on some occasions, though he has also suggested at other times that it would be 20%. 

He has also suggested that tariffs are a negotiating tool to secure more favorable trade terms for U.S. exports, leaving it unclear what level of tariffs would be implemented and whether they would remain in place over the long-term.

The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) estimated that the universal baseline tariff would bring in $4.3 trillion in revenue over a decade if it's set at 20%, while it would yield about $2.5 trillion at a 10% rate. 

FEDERAL DEFICIT NEARS $2 TRILLION AND GETTING WORSE, EXPERTS WARN

Donald Trump

Former President Trump has called for a universal baseline tariff, which he has said would be 10% or 20%. (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images / Getty Images)

CRFB's analysis also incorporates potential revenue loss from dynamic effects on the economy, as the Tax Foundation estimated the 10% universal tariff and 60% tariff on Chinese imports would lower U.S. gross domestic product by about 1.2%. Potential revenue loss from the tariffs' impact on the economy resulted in CRFB estimating the deficit reduction impact of the more aggressive tariff proposals at $2 trillion.

CRFB noted that "such a significant change to trade policy could have economic and geopolitical repercussions that go beyond what a standard tax model would estimate" and that, "Due to the novelty of this policy, the true economic impact is hard to predict."

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

CRFB also estimated that increasing domestic energy production and reversing green energy tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act would save about $700 billion based on their central estimate, though it could range higher to $750 billion or lower to $550 billion.