GOP attacks Blackrock as Fink pivots on ESG
House Republicans are doubling down on anti-ESG agenda
We're trying to push back against ESG as much as we possibly can: Rep. Bill Huizenga
Rep. Bill Huizenga, R-Mich., shares House Republicans' plans to tackle ESG on 'The Bottom Line.'
Republican lawmakers on the House Financial Services Committee are ramping up their offensive against the so-called ESG movement and the corporations that embrace the controversial investment trend.
Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Congressman Bill Huizenga (R-MI), today sent letters to ten of the largest asset managers including BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street and JP Morgan requesting information on how the investing giants balance their ESG initiatives with their fiduciary responsibilities of maximizing investor returns.
DEMOCRAT-LED ESG RULES WILL ‘KILL’ MAIN STREET, CEO WARNS
ESG, short for Environmental, Social Governance is a broad term used to describe an investing technique that encourages public companies to take steps to protect the environment, create governance mandates that ensure diversity and adhere to principles that supposedly better society. In recent years, ESG has grown into a $20 trillion business, popular with some big investors, such as public pension funds. However, many red-state government finance officials have pushed back banning the big ESG players, such as BlackRock, from managing money in state retirement systems. GOP members in Congress such as Huizenga have held hearings on how ESG mandates by asset managers are forcing big corporations to embrace progressive policies in the boardroom and sparked rising inflation as oil companies cut output to meet ESG standards.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - NOVEMBER 04: The headquarters of BlackRock stands in Manhattan as hundreds of members of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) march to the Manhattan financial company, the largest shareholder in the mining company Warrior Me ((Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images) / Getty Images)
Amid the conservative backlash, BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager with just over $9 trillion in assets under management, is looking to possibly change the narrative regarding its association with ESG. The firm and its CEO Larry Fink have been among the biggest targets of the attacks. Fink, in interviews on FOX Business, has said that BlackRock is charting a moderate course on ESG and only offers it to clients who hire the asset manager for that purpose.
DESANTIS WARNS ESG MOVEMENT DRIVEN BY ‘WOKE’ CORPORATE CEO BULLIES IN NEW BOOK
In June, he made headlines when he said he won’t use the term ESG anymore because it has become too political. And on Monday, BlackRock named Amin Nasser, the CEO of the world’s largest oil producer Saudi Aramco, as the newest member of its Board of Directors, in a move seen to appease critics who say BlackRock’s ESG commitments have caused a decline in oil production.
A BlackRock spokesman had no comment. The other companies named above did not immediately return calls for comment.
Representative Bill Huizenga, a Republican from Michigan and chairman of the House Capital Markets, Securities, and Investment Subcommittee, speaks during a hearing in Washington, D.C., U.S., on April 17, 2018. Photographer: Zach Gibson/Bloomberg via (Zach Gibson/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)
It’s unclear if BlackRock's recent efforts are enough to quell the criticism from the right. Huizenga’s letters cite the example of a collective pledge made by a group of over 300 global asset managers, including the addressees, to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. The goal of the group, known as Net Zero Asset Managers, is for all pledges to eventually have their entire portfolios made up of companies that focus on decarbonization and support a similar goal of net-zero emissions.
Huizenga points out that, by making such commitments, investment institutions inherently involve themselves and their clients in social and political matters that do not appear to directly contribute to investor returns.
"These decisions can have a very serious impact on everyday investors and those saving for retirement," Huizenga told FOX Business. "The fiduciary responsibility should be to maximize returns, period. This should not be an experiment in pushing an ideological and political agenda that reduces financial security and makes it harder for Americans to retire."
In the past two weeks, the House Financial Services Committee held five subcommittee meetings and one full committee hearing to examine the effect of ESG-related policies on the financial markets and the everyday investor.
Larry Fink, chief executive officer of BlackRock Inc., speaks virtually during the Bloomberg Green Summit on a laptop computer in Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S., on Monday, April 26, 2021. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images (Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)
Today, the Committee pressed the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Director of Corporation Finance, Erik Gerding, on the agency’s controversial climate proposal that would, if passed, require public companies to make costly disclosures on their carbon footprints.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS
"The House Financial Services Committee is leading the fight in Washington against damaging ESG policies," tweeted Patrick McHenry (R-NC), Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee. "President Biden is using financial regulators to advance his radical climate and social goals without a mandate from the American people."