Amazon hits back at Parler lawsuit, claims 'unwillingness and inability' to remove violent content
Parler enters third day of being offline
Washington Examiner senior political columnist weighs in on Parler filing lawsuit against Amazon.
Amazon hit back at Parler on Tuesday after the alternative social media site filed a lawsuit against the corporate giant this week following its suspension from Amazon Web Services.
Parler on Wednesday entered its third day of being offline after Amazon Web Services cut off the upstart platform from its cloud hosting service following last week's deadly riot at the U.S. Capitol.
"This case is not about suppressing speech or stifling viewpoints. It is not about a conspiracy to restrain trade," Amazon Web Services said in a response to Parler's lawsuit. "Instead, this case is about Parler’s demonstrated unwillingness and inability to remove from the servers of Amazon Web Services ('AWS') content that threatens the public safety, such as by inciting and planning the rape, torture, and assassination of named public officials and private citizens."
| Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | AMAZON.COM INC. | 214.10 | +5.19 | +2.48% |
Amazon Web Services said it told Parler repeatedly that content on the site violated the two companies' agreement. Suspension was a "last resort" to block access to violent content, AWS said, "including plans for violence to disrupt the impending Presidential transition."
"There is no legal basis in AWS's customer agreements or otherwise to compel AWS to host content of this nature," the response reads.
Parler is seeking a temporary restraining order to keep Amazon Web Services from blackballing Parler. It claims AWS is violating the Sherman Antitrust Act in the filing, pointing out that AWS has an agreement with competitor Twitter.
This illustration picture shows social media application logo from Parler displayed on a smartphone with its website in the background in Arlington, Virginia on July 2, 2020. (Photo by OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images) (OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP via Getty Images)
AWS argued in the filing that a temporary restraining order would limit its ability to respond to websites with violent content.
EPIK SAYS IT HAS NOT DISCUSSED HOSTING PARLER DESPITE DOMAIN REGISTRATION
The suit comes as Google and Apple have also taken action against Parler in the wake of a pro-Trump riot at the U.S. Capitol. Google suspended Parler from its app store Friday due to a failure to moderate "egregious content" posted by users related to the violent siege last week.
AWS said it does not host Twitter's feed and "could not have suspended access to Twitter's content," after the "#hangmikepence" hashtag trended on Twitter.
Parler also accused Amazon Web Services of breach of contract, and Amazon threw the accusation right back.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
"Despite Parler’s rhetoric, its lawsuit is no more than a meritless claim for breach of contract. But the facts are unequivocal: If there is any breach, it is Parler’s demonstrated failure and inability to identify and remove such content," Amazon Web Services said in the response.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS
FOX Business' Talia Kaplan, Audrey Conklin, James Leggate and Brittany De Lea contributed to this report.