Apple urges court to reject Epic's appeal in App Store antitrust case
Outside arguments in support of Apple are due next Thursday
FOX Business Flash top headlines for March 24
Here are your FOX Business Flash top headlines for March 24.
Apple Inc on Thursday told appellate judges that video game maker Epic Games had failed to show any legal error that would justify them overturning a lower-court ruling that found key App Store policies do not break U.S. antitrust law.
Epic, known for its "Fortnite" game, largely lost a trial last year over whether Apple's payment rules for apps were anticompetitive. That decision found Apple had suitable reasons to force some app makers such as Epic to use its payment system and take commissions of 15% to 30% on their sales.
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE
Following the ruling, Epic appealed in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
Clicking the App Store icon on the new ipad . (iStock)
Apple in its reply on Thursday said Epic had failed to propose a reasonable alternative to the App Store policies.
"Epic asks the Judiciary to fundamentally change the App Store by forcing Apple to abandon the integrated distribution and digital-content delivery model that, among many other procompetitive benefits, helps safeguard user security and privacy," the court filing said.
Gamers play the video game 'fortnite' developed by Epic Games. (Photo by Chesnot/Getty Images) ( (Photo by Chesnot/Getty Images) / Getty Images)
Both Apple and Epic are scheduled to file a second round of arguments before the appeals panel calls a hearing, for possibly next year.
In support of Epic's appeal, attorneys general for 34 U.S. states and the District of Columbia said in January that Apple is stifling competition through its mobile app store.
| Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCEHY | TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD. | 51.47 | +1.08 | +2.14% |
| AAPL | APPLE INC. | 234.93 | -0.13 | -0.06% |
Outside arguments in support of Apple are due next Thursday.
Experts and critics of the lower-court decision have said it is striking that the judge found Apple had broken California's unfair competition law but not federal antitrust law.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS
Similarly, Apple in its cross-appeal on Thursday questioned how it could be held liable under state law if its practices were not found illegal under federal law.
(Reporting by Paresh Dave; Editing by Aurora Ellis)